October 22, 2014
starrynightsandsummerrays:

brsis:

achievementhugger:

thebabbagepatch:

ilacktact:

mycosmicreality:

adeyami:

US students will be able to shield themselves during school shootings with the latest in body armour, the Bodyguard Blanket
http://goo.gl/WwvECT
Are fucking kidding me? I have been sitting at home and constantly watching the news after the events of yesterday. For those of you who are wondering, I am a junior at REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL! I was there when the shooter kept running in the halls trying to open the doors and get in. I was there in the dark praying and crying while my librarian kept saying ” they’ll have to kill me before they touch my kids” I have known her for three years, her determination to keep us safe broke her heart. Seeing this, that little children need protection in school. Are we sending kids to a battlefield? I have three little brothers ranging from 5-10, and still people have the nerve to speak about the second amendment? Really? I can’t even type anymore. I’m so disgusted and frustrated. When will you realize that it’s important to have gun control? When a shooter is pointing a gun at your child? Is that when you’ll realize that guns aren’t something to be kept around. People say it’s a free country but honesty, this country is more oppressed and diseased than any other country.

Show me ONE instance where gun control and gun free zones prevented school shootings.



Let me tell you guys a story. In 1996, in a little town in Australia called Port Arthur, a gunman killed 35 and injured 23. This place was a tourist attraction, with plenty of visitors and locals going about their business. 35 people died.That’s 35 marriages, anniversaries, birthdays or uni degrees. 35 people left Port Arthur in body bags.At the time, we had a pretty conservative government, and the Prime Minister at the time (in hindsight) was kind of a dick. But within two weeks of the shooting, Howard instituted a massive reform and buyback of all firearms. 
But it must be a statistical flaw, you say, there weren’t that many massacres before 1996, right? No, WRONG. In the eighteen years leading up to Port Arthur, there had been 13 mass shootings. 
But April, you ask, this couldn’t possibly have worked could it? Wouldn’t it only have reduced the mass shootings? WRONG.Since 1996, there have been ZERO mass shootings. That’s right, ZERO. FUCKING ZILCH. There have been scattered homicides, however:
How many schools have been raided and children murdered? NONE.How many film buffs have been murdered in their seats? NONE.How many innocent lives have been lost to the barrel of a gun? NONE.
On top of this, homicides involving the use of guns, and youth suicide involving the use of guns has declined dramatically, by up to 60%
Australia, however much the environment tries to kill you, is a safe haven, and you can walk the streets with 99% assurance that you won’t fall victim to a drive by shooting.
Your move, America.

in 1987 a lone gunman killed 16 people, wounded 15 and then committed suicide. within six months the uk government passed an amendment to the firearms act effectively outlawing all high calibre, high frequency, high capacity rifles and shotguns.
in 1996 another lone gunman killed 16 children and their teacher, and then committed suicide. again within six months the uk government outlawed all handguns. special dispensation had to be issued in order to hold shooting competition as part of the 2012 olympic games, and british hopefuls had to train overseas.
you can legally own certain types of shotgun, .22 calibre rifles over a certain barrel length, and antiques. that’s it.
in the nigh-on twenty years since the uk has had one mass shooting. one. and we’re down to about 30 gun-related deaths annually.
there is not one example of gun control laws reducing mass shootings and gun-related homicide. there are dozens. it literally works every time. the usa is the anomaly not because it didn’t work but because it hasn’t tried.

You do realize that in our country it is a constitutional right to own a gun. It states it right there in the constitution. The second amendment reads: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The government literally cannot do anything to take guns away they can only place regulations such as age, clear mental health, registering your guns, etc. And in my opinion guns aren’t the problem people are the problem. People may use guns but if they suffer from a psychotic break or simply snap like most shooters involved in a mass shooting, they’re going to kill people no matter what. If not by way of a gun then a bomb or any other weapon real or makeshift. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

 Oh don’t give me that crap. Constitutional laws can change. A more strict procedure is necessary for constitutional changes, but someone who thinks it is impossible, especially if it is a law made for a different time period, has it all backwards.
 And if he doesn’t use a gun, he will use a bomb? Firearms ban includes bombs as well FFS, and any other weapon that should be exclusive to police and the army.
 Also, nobody expects the law to make the country free of violence or whatever. Gangsters will still have them, mafia will still have them, etc. The difference is, many of these sickos are your average Joes, not members of crime syndicates and their only source of weaponry is the one they can legally acquire. It won’t erase violence, but it sure as hell would reduce the number of victims as these Average Joes would lose access to the more fatal weaponry.
 And it doesn’t matter if people are the problem as you can’t change a crazy person, at least not without turning the country into a Dystopia. So you do the second best: handicap them… and as mentioned by the former posters, the handicaps have proven to be quite effective in the rest of the world.

starrynightsandsummerrays:

brsis:

achievementhugger:

thebabbagepatch:

ilacktact:

mycosmicreality:

adeyami:

US students will be able to shield themselves during school shootings with the latest in body armour, the Bodyguard Blanket

http://goo.gl/WwvECT

Are fucking kidding me? I have been sitting at home and constantly watching the news after the events of yesterday. For those of you who are wondering, I am a junior at REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL! I was there when the shooter kept running in the halls trying to open the doors and get in. I was there in the dark praying and crying while my librarian kept saying ” they’ll have to kill me before they touch my kids” I have known her for three years, her determination to keep us safe broke her heart. Seeing this, that little children need protection in school. Are we sending kids to a battlefield? I have three little brothers ranging from 5-10, and still people have the nerve to speak about the second amendment? Really? I can’t even type anymore. I’m so disgusted and frustrated. When will you realize that it’s important to have gun control? When a shooter is pointing a gun at your child? Is that when you’ll realize that guns aren’t something to be kept around. People say it’s a free country but honesty, this country is more oppressed and diseased than any other country.

Show me ONE instance where gun control and gun free zones prevented school shootings.

image

Let me tell you guys a story.
In 1996, in a little town in Australia called Port Arthur, a gunman killed 35 and injured 23. This place was a tourist attraction, with plenty of visitors and locals going about their business. 
35 people died.That’s 35 marriages, anniversaries, birthdays or uni degrees. 35 people left Port Arthur in body bags.
At the time, we had a pretty conservative government, and the Prime Minister at the time (in hindsight) was kind of a dick. But within two weeks of the shooting, Howard instituted a massive reform and buyback of all firearms. 

But it must be a statistical flaw, you say, there weren’t that many massacres before 1996, right? No, WRONG. 
In the eighteen years leading up to Port Arthur, there had been 13 mass shootings. 

But April, you ask, this couldn’t possibly have worked could it? Wouldn’t it only have reduced the mass shootings? WRONG.
Since 1996, there have been ZERO mass shootings. That’s right, ZERO. FUCKING ZILCH. There have been scattered homicides, however:

How many schools have been raided and children murdered? NONE.
How many film buffs have been murdered in their seats? NONE.
How many innocent lives have been lost to the barrel of a gun? NONE.

On top of this, homicides involving the use of guns, and youth suicide involving the use of guns has declined dramatically, by up to 60%

Australia, however much the environment tries to kill you, is a safe haven, and you can walk the streets with 99% assurance that you won’t fall victim to a drive by shooting.

Your move, America.

in 1987 a lone gunman killed 16 people, wounded 15 and then committed suicide. within six months the uk government passed an amendment to the firearms act effectively outlawing all high calibre, high frequency, high capacity rifles and shotguns.

in 1996 another lone gunman killed 16 children and their teacher, and then committed suicide. again within six months the uk government outlawed all handguns. special dispensation had to be issued in order to hold shooting competition as part of the 2012 olympic games, and british hopefuls had to train overseas.

you can legally own certain types of shotgun, .22 calibre rifles over a certain barrel length, and antiques. that’s it.

in the nigh-on twenty years since the uk has had one mass shooting. one. and we’re down to about 30 gun-related deaths annually.

there is not one example of gun control laws reducing mass shootings and gun-related homicide. there are dozens. it literally works every time. the usa is the anomaly not because it didn’t work but because it hasn’t tried.

You do realize that in our country it is a constitutional right to own a gun. It states it right there in the constitution. The second amendment reads: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The government literally cannot do anything to take guns away they can only place regulations such as age, clear mental health, registering your guns, etc. And in my opinion guns aren’t the problem people are the problem. People may use guns but if they suffer from a psychotic break or simply snap like most shooters involved in a mass shooting, they’re going to kill people no matter what. If not by way of a gun then a bomb or any other weapon real or makeshift. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

 Oh don’t give me that crap. Constitutional laws can change. A more strict procedure is necessary for constitutional changes, but someone who thinks it is impossible, especially if it is a law made for a different time period, has it all backwards.

 And if he doesn’t use a gun, he will use a bomb? Firearms ban includes bombs as well FFS, and any other weapon that should be exclusive to police and the army.

 Also, nobody expects the law to make the country free of violence or whatever. Gangsters will still have them, mafia will still have them, etc. The difference is, many of these sickos are your average Joes, not members of crime syndicates and their only source of weaponry is the one they can legally acquire. It won’t erase violence, but it sure as hell would reduce the number of victims as these Average Joes would lose access to the more fatal weaponry.

 And it doesn’t matter if people are the problem as you can’t change a crazy person, at least not without turning the country into a Dystopia. So you do the second best: handicap them… and as mentioned by the former posters, the handicaps have proven to be quite effective in the rest of the world.

October 22, 2014

dropsofamortentia:

cumberbuddy:

wojewoda-z:

i will never stop reblogging this. 

The best gif set of 2012, HANDS DOWN. 

(Source: annyskod, via fuon-yuuki)

October 22, 2014
brsis:

achievementhugger:

thebabbagepatch:

ilacktact:

mycosmicreality:

adeyami:

US students will be able to shield themselves during school shootings with the latest in body armour, the Bodyguard Blanket
http://goo.gl/WwvECT
Are fucking kidding me? I have been sitting at home and constantly watching the news after the events of yesterday. For those of you who are wondering, I am a junior at REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL! I was there when the shooter kept running in the halls trying to open the doors and get in. I was there in the dark praying and crying while my librarian kept saying ” they’ll have to kill me before they touch my kids” I have known her for three years, her determination to keep us safe broke her heart. Seeing this, that little children need protection in school. Are we sending kids to a battlefield? I have three little brothers ranging from 5-10, and still people have the nerve to speak about the second amendment? Really? I can’t even type anymore. I’m so disgusted and frustrated. When will you realize that it’s important to have gun control? When a shooter is pointing a gun at your child? Is that when you’ll realize that guns aren’t something to be kept around. People say it’s a free country but honesty, this country is more oppressed and diseased than any other country.

Show me ONE instance where gun control and gun free zones prevented school shootings.



Let me tell you guys a story. In 1996, in a little town in Australia called Port Arthur, a gunman killed 35 and injured 23. This place was a tourist attraction, with plenty of visitors and locals going about their business. 35 people died.That’s 35 marriages, anniversaries, birthdays or uni degrees. 35 people left Port Arthur in body bags.At the time, we had a pretty conservative government, and the Prime Minister at the time (in hindsight) was kind of a dick. But within two weeks of the shooting, Howard instituted a massive reform and buyback of all firearms. 
But it must be a statistical flaw, you say, there weren’t that many massacres before 1996, right? No, WRONG. In the eighteen years leading up to Port Arthur, there had been 13 mass shootings. 
But April, you ask, this couldn’t possibly have worked could it? Wouldn’t it only have reduced the mass shootings? WRONG.Since 1996, there have been ZERO mass shootings. That’s right, ZERO. FUCKING ZILCH. There have been scattered homicides, however:
How many schools have been raided and children murdered? NONE.How many film buffs have been murdered in their seats? NONE.How many innocent lives have been lost to the barrel of a gun? NONE.
On top of this, homicides involving the use of guns, and youth suicide involving the use of guns has declined dramatically, by up to 60%
Australia, however much the environment tries to kill you, is a safe haven, and you can walk the streets with 99% assurance that you won’t fall victim to a drive by shooting.
Your move, America.

in 1987 a lone gunman killed 16 people, wounded 15 and then committed suicide. within six months the uk government passed an amendment to the firearms act effectively outlawing all high calibre, high frequency, high capacity rifles and shotguns.
in 1996 another lone gunman killed 16 children and their teacher, and then committed suicide. again within six months the uk government outlawed all handguns. special dispensation had to be issued in order to hold shooting competition as part of the 2012 olympic games, and british hopefuls had to train overseas.
you can legally own certain types of shotgun, .22 calibre rifles over a certain barrel length, and antiques. that’s it.
in the nigh-on twenty years since the uk has had one mass shooting. one. and we’re down to about 30 gun-related deaths annually.
there is not one example of gun control laws reducing mass shootings and gun-related homicide. there are dozens. it literally works every time. the usa is the anomaly not because it didn’t work but because it hasn’t tried.

What the hell is with Americans protecting their rights to own tools for murder with such zeal in the first place? I mean, they would rather engrave fear into their children that they might get killed any day than actually try to reduce the number of guns in the country, thus reducing a chance that a sicko gets his hands on it? It won’t stop the gangs and mafia true, but these mass murders are not done by people with enough connections to illegally get guns in the first place.

brsis:

achievementhugger:

thebabbagepatch:

ilacktact:

mycosmicreality:

adeyami:

US students will be able to shield themselves during school shootings with the latest in body armour, the Bodyguard Blanket

http://goo.gl/WwvECT

Are fucking kidding me? I have been sitting at home and constantly watching the news after the events of yesterday. For those of you who are wondering, I am a junior at REYNOLDS HIGH SCHOOL! I was there when the shooter kept running in the halls trying to open the doors and get in. I was there in the dark praying and crying while my librarian kept saying ” they’ll have to kill me before they touch my kids” I have known her for three years, her determination to keep us safe broke her heart. Seeing this, that little children need protection in school. Are we sending kids to a battlefield? I have three little brothers ranging from 5-10, and still people have the nerve to speak about the second amendment? Really? I can’t even type anymore. I’m so disgusted and frustrated. When will you realize that it’s important to have gun control? When a shooter is pointing a gun at your child? Is that when you’ll realize that guns aren’t something to be kept around. People say it’s a free country but honesty, this country is more oppressed and diseased than any other country.

Show me ONE instance where gun control and gun free zones prevented school shootings.

image

Let me tell you guys a story.
In 1996, in a little town in Australia called Port Arthur, a gunman killed 35 and injured 23. This place was a tourist attraction, with plenty of visitors and locals going about their business. 
35 people died.That’s 35 marriages, anniversaries, birthdays or uni degrees. 35 people left Port Arthur in body bags.
At the time, we had a pretty conservative government, and the Prime Minister at the time (in hindsight) was kind of a dick. But within two weeks of the shooting, Howard instituted a massive reform and buyback of all firearms. 

But it must be a statistical flaw, you say, there weren’t that many massacres before 1996, right? No, WRONG. 
In the eighteen years leading up to Port Arthur, there had been 13 mass shootings. 

But April, you ask, this couldn’t possibly have worked could it? Wouldn’t it only have reduced the mass shootings? WRONG.
Since 1996, there have been ZERO mass shootings. That’s right, ZERO. FUCKING ZILCH. There have been scattered homicides, however:

How many schools have been raided and children murdered? NONE.
How many film buffs have been murdered in their seats? NONE.
How many innocent lives have been lost to the barrel of a gun? NONE.

On top of this, homicides involving the use of guns, and youth suicide involving the use of guns has declined dramatically, by up to 60%

Australia, however much the environment tries to kill you, is a safe haven, and you can walk the streets with 99% assurance that you won’t fall victim to a drive by shooting.

Your move, America.

in 1987 a lone gunman killed 16 people, wounded 15 and then committed suicide. within six months the uk government passed an amendment to the firearms act effectively outlawing all high calibre, high frequency, high capacity rifles and shotguns.

in 1996 another lone gunman killed 16 children and their teacher, and then committed suicide. again within six months the uk government outlawed all handguns. special dispensation had to be issued in order to hold shooting competition as part of the 2012 olympic games, and british hopefuls had to train overseas.

you can legally own certain types of shotgun, .22 calibre rifles over a certain barrel length, and antiques. that’s it.

in the nigh-on twenty years since the uk has had one mass shooting. one. and we’re down to about 30 gun-related deaths annually.

there is not one example of gun control laws reducing mass shootings and gun-related homicide. there are dozens. it literally works every time. the usa is the anomaly not because it didn’t work but because it hasn’t tried.

What the hell is with Americans protecting their rights to own tools for murder with such zeal in the first place? I mean, they would rather engrave fear into their children that they might get killed any day than actually try to reduce the number of guns in the country, thus reducing a chance that a sicko gets his hands on it? It won’t stop the gangs and mafia true, but these mass murders are not done by people with enough connections to illegally get guns in the first place.

(via grammarsaveslives)

October 22, 2014

(Source: thisuglyyetbeautifulworld, via jukitachan)

October 22, 2014
akagatari:

…赤と青(のパンツ)の男 | 門別 [pixiv]

akagatari:


赤と青(のパンツ)の男 | 門別 [pixiv]

11:19am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZiJjLw1TlbeKL
  
Filed under: Fate FSN Archer Lancer 
October 22, 2014

(Source: pema001, via thivus)

October 22, 2014

altelm:

actualryuko:

PEOPLE WHO APPLY SOCIAL JUSTICE TO ANIME: S T O P

PEOPLE WHO APPLY SOCIAL JUSTICE TO VIDEO GAMES: S T O P

PEOPLE WHO APPLY SOCIAL JUSTICE RANDOMLY: S T O P

(via thivus)

October 22, 2014

thefrogman:

[video]

(Source: lolgifs.net)

12:49am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZiJjLw1TjNCNP
  
Filed under: misc 
October 22, 2014

Anonymous said: how are you not racist? tell me how? racism is prejudice and violence against people solely based on the color of their skin. that is what it is, and that is what you're doing, and promoting. how are you not racist? how can you deny that you aren't?

ughsocialjustice:

fiend—angelical:

dort-am-klavier:

fiend—angelical:

dort-am-klavier:

fiend—angelical:

dort-am-klavier:

fiend—angelical:

dort-am-klavier:

fiend—angelical:

dort-am-klavier:

fiend--angelical:

Racism is a SYSTEM of oppression against people of color, try again.

Being racist is not though. Racism is institutionalized. Being racist just means holding prejudice against others for their skin color. So “try again”

Bitch, you’re white, shut up. How can you understand that racism is systeatic and an institution, and then say that you can be racist WITHOUT upholding that system/institution, and viceversa.

Literally die.

Right. I’m also eastern European and the west is very racist towards easterners. While eastern Europeans in western countries can’t systematically oppress westerners, you can bet your ass some are still racist towards western europeans. It’s only natural to hate those that hate you, doesn’t mean that being racist isn’t a two way street. So racism isn’t just black people vs white people everywhere. Although yeah, racism towards black people is pretty rampant. However, claiming some people aren’t racist because they’re a minority is bullshit.

Okay, so you’re a super duper special unique kind of white. Big fucking deal. That’s not fucking racism, that’s xenophobia, and even if it were, it is OTHER white people doing that to you, so it still goes back to the less special super unique crackers.

You’re just a cracker with a little cheese on top, big shitty deal.

I’m latina, you think there’s no conflict between us? Even between latinxs of the same race but who come from different countries? Eat my entire ass, that shit doesn’t count.

Literally die, again.

Oh you’re Latina? So you’re a super duper special kind of not white.
OH WAIT, DO YOU HEAR HOW RACIST THAT IS? Its no different coming from you.
You know, I thought there was some kind of potential for us to come to an understanding here, but at this point I’m convinced you’re either a troll blog, or unbelievably unintelligent. Either way, I’m not wasting anymore time on you. I think I lost brain cells reading your replies honestly. Get a fucking education before you start spewing bullshit all over the internet and screaming “OPPRESSION”.
Also, “literally die”…. As opposed to what? Figuratively die? Have fun being a racist piece of shit, you’ll go SO far in life.

Yes, fucking cunt. That’s racist BECAUSE I’M NOT WHITE, but you are despite what part of Crackerlandia you come from, and seriously, the only people who give you shit are other crackers… And the people who give US shit are also crackers, you included.

If this was a fucking white latinx I’d ALSO tell you you’re just a fucking special unique cracker.

Oh yes, come insult the intelligence of the lowly autistic sp*c to cover up for your white supremacist ass, yes. Very nice.

And also nice classism there. You know, besides the ableism and white supremacy.

Since you don’t like “literally die,” then I literally hope you kill yourself ^^

Just because you’re autistic doesn’t mean you can’t also be intelligent.

Nice victim complex.

And nah, I’m not gonna kill myself, thank for the suggestion though.

When… Did I say… I’m not intelligent… Like…

Did you fucking read anything.

Also, I thought you weren’t wasting anymore time on the stupid lowly sp*c but I guess you lied.

Pity about the last part, I wanted to throw a party :c

I’m just letting you embarrass yourself now, and making sure more people see it.

Hahahahahaha, it’s okay sweetie. It’s okay.

Sure, I’m the one embarassing myself. Okay. Have fun being a white supremacist ableist classist cunt! ^^

That IS actually going to get you far in life, sadly. /shrugs

Oh god…

I’m just gonna leave it here.

(The gender description in the sidebar is also a goldmine, check it out. Hilariously “non-racist” latina… True story.)

-The Non-Binary One

I’d call fiend—angelical an imbecile, but that would be an insult to all the imbeciles in the world.

October 22, 2014

basediichigo:

should i watch fate zero before fate stay night or can i just jump into fate stay night bc fate zero’s first ep is like 43min and i have the attention span of a 5 year old….

You do not need to watch Fate/Zero. As a matter of fact, Fate/Zero is supposed to be watched by those who know Fate/Stay Night’s plot.

October 22, 2014

(Source: beyocne, via epic-humor)

12:21am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZiJjLw1TjFQdO
  
Filed under: misc 
October 22, 2014

octohocuspocus:

sizvideos:

Video

@believeinagreatperhaps

(via catsncats)

October 21, 2014

entering-loser-ville:

godshideouscreation:

thisisnicolai:

"Fuck yo ambitions"

this is honestly the best post and so like dogs its not even funny

One time my mom dropped 20 dollars and my dog ate it

(Source: ThisisNicolai, via serbarawarden)

11:45pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZiJjLw1Tj52rC
  
Filed under: dogs 
October 21, 2014

holdharmonysacred:

Another question:

We know that besides figures from history and mythology, there are summonable Servants from classic pieces of fiction, such as Frankenstein’s Monster (Berserker of Black) and Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (PrototypeFragments!Berserker), right?

So, like……. do the books they’re from actually exist in the times we see them summoned in? Are they actual, historical events within the Nasuverse rather than works of fiction? Are they actual events in the Nasuverse that were unknown to the public, but had their story told via Literary Agent Hypothesis? Or is the Throne of Heroes powerful enough to smash the internal fourth wall to pieces and allow people to summon up purely fictional characters who never actually existed on their level of reality?

 It was explained at the very start: a Servant is a famous character from history or mythology. What creates a Servant is enough humans revering a certain person in either positive (Heroic Spirit) or negative way (Wicked Spirit), no matter if it is real or not. In case it was a real person and that person is known*, the person in question will be summoned while if it is a fictional person, that one of fictional versions will be summoned.

 *and that person is known - this is actually very important: Jack The Ripper existed, but you will unlikely summon the real Jack the Ripper, but one of the “mythical” ones. The reason for this is that nobody ever knew who real Jack was and the fact that there are countless theories on it results in many different kinds of Jack being summoned (Hassan works in a similar fashion, but it is a bit less chaotic)

11:44pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZiJjLw1Tj4xjV
  
Filed under: Fate FSN 
October 21, 2014
jeanyluvschu:

♥

jeanyluvschu:

(via thivus)